While both companies use ARM CPU cores, MediaTek uses ARM architecture like the Cortex-A73 or Cortex-A76, for example, as is. The Snapdragon variants of S and Note-series phones tend to have better graphics performance compared to the Exynos variants - which also use Mali GPUs.Īside from graphics, we also have CPU performance to account for. It’s not an exact comparison between Qualcomm and MediaTek, but you can see this in Samsung’s flagship smartphones. Qualcomm’s Adreno GPUs simply perform better than their Mali counterparts. This is important because this is one of the major advantages Snapdragon chips have over Helio chips. As opposed to MediaTek’s Mali GPU, which is also technology licensed from ARM. To most smartphone users, the most major difference that separates Qualcomm chips from MediaTek chips is that their GPU cores, known as Adreno, are developed by Qualcomm themselves. Also, neither of them actually own the designs of the processor cores used in their respective chipsets - these are licensed from another company, ARM. Instead, they mostly do research and design. Neither Qualcomm or MediaTek manufacture their own products. Instead, we will take a look at the differences you can expect between Qualcomm Snapdragon and MediaTek Helio chipsets.īut first, a look into what these two companies actually do. This article is not going to discuss the history of the two companies. Whether it’s purists saying Qualcomm is superior, or bashers hating on MediaTek, it’s a persistent occurrence. In almost any article or video about a smartphone, you are likely to see a bunch of people in the comments section causing a ruckus. For several years now, one of the most debated topics online in the world of tech is Qualcomm Snapdragon vs MediaTek Helio chipsets.

Cpu compare game debate